« December 2004 | Main | February 2005 »

January 29, 2005

their motto: dare to be dull

That's right, I heard that FederalNewsRadio.com has this slogan, from NPR a month back or so. It's so bold it's boring. Talk about pride in being a government worker. Makes me wonder, what would techies dare to be?
Not Candidates:
Sleepless
Demanding
Persistent
Religious
Curious
Accomplished
Potential Candidates:
Fashionable
Emotional
Well Adjusted
Home

You get the idea. It takes bravery to be something that most adults would make fun of you for.

Side note: This makes for a great use case for audio tagging. That web site? Can't find the slogan on it at all, as interesting as it was. The NPR page lists the synopsis only, I can listen to the audio file and find the exact quote, but why, when I can't link back to it? Great example for how NPR lost a link from me today, how having the file in audio is a conversation stopper.

you are totally good

Very interesting discussion started over here on "Proudly Serving My Corporate Masters." It's about how "good" a company is. I've been meaning to write about ethics for a while, so this is a good start.

A company has a relationship with its employees similar to one spouse to the other in a marriage. In marriage, you know it's working when you are each somehow better for having the other person around. Better can mean a nicer person, or edgier, or you can do more with less, or more relaxed, or any definition you choose. It's nice to think back and realize: I had greater capabilities married to THIS person than I would have ordinarily by myself. And conversely a marriage fails at least one critical test if this turns out to be false. Now, back to employees, your company should have more capabilities with you on board, and you as the employee should be able to do more as well. People tend to quit when they feel their company is holding them back. Similarly, they tend to get fired when the company realizes (with anthill-like consciousness) that it would be able to do more with a different person in this role.

So, let's talk about the definition of a good company. It has parallels with the definition of a good person or a good marriage. From the previous post, the implicit definition was that a company was good if it was generous, almost in a benefactor sense, with its employees, and probably the occasional customer too. Classic employee complacency comes from expecting the corporation to cough up 60% and for the employee to only provide 40% of the value in the transaction. Then, your dental plan deductible gets tweaked and everyone goes on strike to reclaim back to 60%. Employees like getting back more than they put in, it means it's a good place for them to work, it's almost an entrepreneurial transaction for them. One definition of a good company might be this generosity, this willingness by the company to give back to their employees again and again.

Microsoft definitely does not feel this way. At all junctures the employee (or proxy employee) is made to remember that they will leave the battlefield with less pints of blood than they started with. This is as simple as bug triage, or as complex as a department announcement. The red and blue pills are presented along with the koolaid. At any given snapshot of time, employees are going the extra mile, exceeding expectations, and winning victories outside of their key yearly goals, or any other metric, and therefore will go untracked and uncompensated. This is a feeling that we all toughen up to. Some thrive in it. My closest image I can come up with is in Dune with the stilsuits, how some people were able to operate at extraordinarily low water capacity, while others are "fat with water." Microsoft employees have the stilsuits cranked to 11. Is it a good company? Not if you're looking for benevoloence. You can have a great year, but also unmeasurably so, because the metrics are based only among numbers of enemies vanquished as opposed to comerades saved. But it's a good company if you want to count yourself among the heroes, among those who need less oxygen, fuel, and water to still be successful.

Perhaps I'm romanticizing and judging a little bit too. I get exasperated when I hear employees talk about what should or should not be done for them by the in absentia parentis otherwise known as the corporation. We are all entrepreneurs here, even those who work at Costco. We build a business from a transaction we view as favorable enough to repeat. And we go into work the next day, because that way we are capable of more than just by ourselves.

January 28, 2005

Spam on MSN Groups but not Yahoo Groups

Just wanted to make an anecdotal note that a friend's MSN group site is becoming unusable due to spam coming from the site. I have a Yahoo site myself and there has been no spam yet. Of course I also have a test MSN account and no spam there. Not sure what the technical differences are between the sites. But wow did MSN fall short inn terms of helping their customers. My friend had to send out an e-mail telling people the only way to fix this was leave the group. Actually this is incorrect - not her fault for missing this - the way to fix this is to change your group settings to read the messages online (=no mail).

Groups are interesting, they have lots of technologies in there and are mostly underutilized. We use our group for our calendar, although no one has really maximized the display capabilities ("I see you're free on Saturday...") In practice most people use groups as a free e-mail listmanager. That's rather reductive although I see why they do it.

This friend of mine, the aforementioned unhappy owner of this msn group, gave me some ideas early on concerning time management and families. Occasionally she gets everyone together on a chore chart, or simply goes "code red" (paper plates and takeout) until sanity is restored. She had her complete calendar on MSN as well, which inspired me, but she didn't maintain it and resorted to paper on the fridge. I think you just can't count on the kids to read it, and you can't wait for your computer to boot in order to check something if you're on the kitchen phone with someone. Good example for why booting should be abolished.

Hey, now there's a concept. Give me a detatchable chip I can have ordered online, with just the OS I want, plus a few apps that are not on trial. Send me a new chip every few weeks. Have the chip be read-only, as I think all chips are. Now all we'd need to protect is our data.

January 27, 2005

thoughts on the blog business summit

OCCURRING TO ME WHILE SCOBLE WAS GIVING KEYNOTE
* Conferences like this need to figure out whether they are something for people already in the business to figure out what's latest and greatest, or are they for new people considering business blogs. Everyone in attendance had already taken the red pill. Everyone WAS the red pill. Granted I was pleased to attend this conference, but at times there was dissonance when speakers would go "for those of you who don't know what RSS is..." and look around the room for anyone who might fit into that category. I wrote down on my notepages "We are just here to find out the stories we are telling ourselves about what's happening. We already know what's happening." Stories are big. Stories are reality. I'd like to say there was a different one for each speaker but they were quite homogeneous.
* Starbucks works like a national park system. They are indoor parks. Places to sit and talk. What if the national park system took over starbucks locations. These are public spaces. We feel a sense of ownership about them, that perhaps we don't deserve.
* I'm sorry, Radio Userland was not the end all for ease of publishing. It is very hard to go into one of those templates. Just because they were first out there (well, first-ish), let's not pretend they hit all the main bullet points of an excellent end to end system.
* People talk about ROI for blogging. The I is investment, presumably time and perhaps bandwidth. This is not the real metric we are interested in. What we're looking for is return on risk. What is the existence of a blog doing for us that makes it worth risking lawsuits, bungled PR, breach of contract, nondisclosure, and various other mishaps. Side note: of course I believe it's worth it, but it's for everyone to measure. ROR seems like a more relevant metric.
* Lots of talk about passion and authenticity. Passion translates into lots of time spent on the subject matter. Authenticity means correct interpretation of the raw data spent in the subject matter, such that you happen to be correct in your interpretations a high percentage of the time. Sigh. Part of the fun of blogging is that it's slightly superfluous, it's a little NOT like work. The premise is the value of a small thought in time is unknown: only google will tell its significance. P and A are great, but if it gives you writer's block just throw up any old knee jerk reaction. Everyone wants to read those too. They do! Sometimes they will pay big focus group money for it. Once upon a time I was working on a software product that we thought was the cat's jammies. It was simple, friendly, more attractive than the 1.0 version and miles more functional than competitorX with their Xproduct. We had a focus group intending to compare the two, and get some quotes for the initial press release. Uh-oh. Our product tanked, Xproduct got a great response. Why? It was blue. Everyone loves blue. They love blue even more than features, or having anything make sense. That's knee-jerk feedback and it would have been gold to us. So be authentic but don't let it stop you from calling it like it is.
* Someone should have sent Robert an e-mail during his talk, saying "Hey, Robert, turn around!" His mails were popping up during his speech. Now we know everything. Or at least the first few lines of it.
* Am I writing a blog about happiness (yes), or am I writing a blog chronicling the conflict between one interpretation of happiness and another (hmmm.) Conflict makes for a great blog entry, consider if this is a way to go. Side note: this comes up later as a theme too.
OCCURRING TO ME DURING HALLEY
* As verbose as bloggers are, they hate powerpoint and use it grudgingly and sparingly. Perhaps this is David Byrne's fault.
* This is all about corporate blogging, but what about career based blogging. A career is a business on an individual scale. This has its own set of howtos. Are you a linker or a thinker? How to get google juice? Title of article: "The Self Centered Blogger" Ahhh, honesty.
* Legitimacy comes now from who you include in your world, not from a preset hierarchy.
* Blogging has to satisfy your goals. If you have no goals, you won't blog.
* My next job, perhaps the rest of my career will come because of this blog. I think I'm done with self-selecting on job boards. I'll get a better match by having folks find out about me via this blog. Whoops, better get out the delete key.
OCCURRING TO ME DURING BUZZ/SCOBLE/ANIL
* More thoughts on knee-jerk blogging. "In defense of haste." This is a counterargument to Scoble's tenet #4 on his manifesto which says "Make sure you support all the latest software / web / human standards." I say, there is a lot of value in reacting to the world like a regular user. Sometimes there is hidden value to those outbursts that cannot be analyzed. Also, time to press has value too, let's be realistic in that all of us won't have the time to do due diligence on everything. I love being a blogger and not a journalist. We can say more and do more. This is our differentiating quality. If we have the time energy and desire to make everything perfect, we should just go into journalism.
* Remember homer simpson's dream car where he asked for every feature and got it?
* One new job could be a blog heckler. This works like a personal coach. You write something, and your heckler from ElizabethGriggSucks.com is keeping her own blog just to take everything down. Keeps you honest. Of course there could also be ElizabethGriggRocks.com. Which I do.
* People are always trying to sound more professional. Corporations are always trying to sound more human. It's like what they say about heterosexual sex: it's all about women trying to have orgasm, and men trying not to have orgasm. At least that's one concise criticism I heard once (credit, anyone?)
OCCURRING TO ME DURING BIZ / MARY / NICK
* Get the slides online so I can look at the FN photo annotation Wiki
* Definitely having a feature to send blog posts over e-mail is like having a feature to send e-mails over fax. Ewww.
* There is a need to create links (gestures) to things that don't exist yet.
* Sparrow Pages. A big place full of little ideas.
* Knowledge management == Question management.
* Is horizontal navigation only so powerful because it's missing all the crud?
OCCURRING TO ME DURING LENN
* Wow, that really was a wet blanket. I'm not sure I want to jump in unless the platform has evolved to include refrerenceable indexing.

NOTE TO SELF SECTION
* Calendars and Ethics needs a blog entry
* Perhaps RSS can solve the delta spec problem
* What about a bot that watches for changed specs?
* Who is the connector person on my team?
* The calendar space is moving slowly, good opportunity to reflect on it in terms of advice to users and the industry. Pretend to be Pogue or Stephen Levy or Mossberg with those two audiences.
* Note to write an entry about a health club, but I forgot what about
* I should go on a world tour. Or at least to California. I should take a vacation and meet certain bloggers with admittedly poor time management, follow them around, and see if I can get some key use cases out of it. The fam can wait in the car while I do this, right? Yes, you're my first test subject, you know who you are. Good opportunity for star charts as well. (In case you didn't know, Star Charts are in the grammar school sense, a task with a star next to it. It's not an astrology thing.)
* Serious amount of doubt about the building I work in, whether it's healthy to be there. Don't know why I was dwelling on this. Perhaps the conference was so much more friendly by comparison. And I knew more people.
* Make sure I don't burden myself with the problems from the thing I discarded. Translation: if I choose to have a career, I can't both miss the kids and worry about money. It's only fair for me to miss the kids.
* Do I dare make the blog entry about what I would say to Rob Glaser if he asked. I'm not sure my thoughts are coherent enough on this yet.
* Why don't I try to become more active in the Outlook community, perhaps MVP. And why don't I read Sue Mosher yet anyway? Grrr.
* Blog entry on what "is" a blog entry. Lots of stuff I have written recently isn't, including this entire section.
* Mark Canter outburst about Clay Shirky: The roof is its own worst enemy. This sounds kindof up my alley, why haven't I read this guy.
* Somebody else please start a blog on Tagging, Folderization, and Flags (oh, my!)
* Great podcasts are sitting in my library
* Could I trick Chris Pirillo into doing Microsoft, the Musical?

david pogue can top mossberg anytime

Sure he doesn't have a vast team of researchers and interns like Walt. And he doesn't have an RSS feed (either does Walt). But if you're wondering who put the capital J in Journalism, David Pogue's work is it. I subscribe to his e-mail newsletter. This week he tore apart the Tivo. He's got use cases, personas, technical breadth and depth. Please make an exception and subscribe to his list too.

January 24, 2005

e-mail and trust

Interesting how I hold my e-mail inbox with such suspicion. The address itself I try to treat as valuable. However, the account itself is spoiled, too many untrustworthy sources have the account. E-mail is text just like blogging, but my subscription list works like trusted information. I never worry about spam, or question people's intentions.

Two cases bring this up for me tonight, eclipsing the Blog Business Summitt which I am partially attending, and the square, lonely, and frightening right angles of the inside of my workplace, which took up most of my day. Not that those things are any less interesting or important - they are both - it's just that e-mail is easier to write about.

The first instance is three messages, all identical, from a trusted source. This is the e-mails I get from my old high school. One was ordinary looking, another was one of those pitiful "recall" messages that never have any effect, and the third was the same message again. Like many people, when I see a recall e-mail I immediately dive in to see why it was recalled. Perhaps I wouldn't have cared if it was blatantly described, but the messages were identical, so there must have been some reason. There it was: she sent the entire school alumnii list out in plaintext in the to: line. No wonder. I admit to scrolling down to see that I was there, and I saw a few other people were there too. I admit one of them had a curious domain completely not what I would expect them to be doing, but when I put the domain in the browser it made sense. But I would never mail them. It just doesn't seem right. The message was recalled, after all. Which, everyone knows doesn't work, but we should respect their intentions.

The next thing in my inbox was someone with an incredibly vague message. It was "thanks for the kind words" and then a link to the main page of my radio weblog. Not sure who this person is or what they're talking about. I ran a search for the sender's name, and there are some google results, but should I click on the additional link they sent, just because of the implicit trust given to this person by those google results? It all hurt my head and I decided to write this instead.

The moral of the story is that e-mail is a very suspicious place, and you need to be very careful. Don't assume people will be thrilled to click on any old link with no explanation. And don't assume people respect those recall notices.

Ah, RSS, the trusted community for communication.

January 22, 2005

wow, look at the time


I'm cleaning out my cell phone in anticipation of taking more photos. At one point I sat on it and switched it to black and white mode.

sniffles.jpg

Here's a cute picture from before that happened.

awww.jpg

He was so young, we didn't know what color his eyes were.
Here's something more recent:

now.jpg

January 20, 2005

questioning, and plots

Being a blogger is a lot like being gay. Consider:

* By my unofficial count, 50% of the non-blogging community thinks blogging is a great way to get fired.
* Another angle regarding blogging is "don't ask don't tell," where, if you were a blogger before you got hired, and continue to be one during your employment, then that's your business.
* If you think your employer is "blog-friendly," and you tell them you're a blogger, they will smile briefly, say "good for you" and then treat you differently forever.
* There are people who are skating around the perimeter of the blogging world. They fall into these familiar categories:
"Blog-Curious" - Folks who want to find out more about blogging. No, we're not that into it. We don't even have a blog. Oh, you do? Interesting.
"Questioning" - Those who are wondering if they possibly have it in them to blog. What could there be to possibly say? How can they be as self-actualized as all the "out" bloggers are? (Our little secret: words can package and brand reality, in which none of us are nearly as packaged or branded).
"Closet Blogger" - This person blogs either anonymously, or has no integration between their personal face-to-face life and the people they meet online. It's the seperation that feels icky, not the blogging itself.
"'Out' Blogger" - Goes to meetups. Blogs in front of people while they're talking. Listens better online than in person. Wishes they could tag reality with permalinks.

On Tuesday I dragged a friend of mine around Crossroads because it was impossible to sit close enough to Joel to hear him. Perhaps the only reason why my friend seemed blog-curious was that she was single, and there were perhaps 90 men there clustered around Joel. I doubt my friend will ever blog. We alternated trying out different seats with just wandering around. Joel made an impression on her nonetheless. I have a hard time remembering what Joel looks like, yet I have photographic memory for his text. I saw someone who I thought was Russell, which seemed odd, but then he turned out to be a recruiter from Amazon. I gave him my first HughTrain card before I knew he was a recruiter. (Couldn't I tell by him asking for my elevator speech? And why don't I have an elevator speech?) Larry was there, who I don't think remembered me from WMDG, and KC was there, who remembered me even though we hadn't met. The Google guys were drawn to each other, all of them big and sporty and outgoing. I felt a kinship for Rory and his bronchitis. Joel had a lemonade from Frankfurter which was the only reasonable choice, almost as if he was tipped off. It was an interesting night. Low on sleep. Felt like I was on a mission, felt like I was being filmed. And of course nothing happened yet as a result of having attended.

I have to believe some nights are like down payments on other nights, you can't get to event #2 without having event #1. That's the filmic quality, you're wondering "why are we looking at the main character's shopping list" when later the broccoli becomes pivotal. That's the problem with planning your life too much, you don't leave room for the plot to be set up.

Google gods, please don't let this post be a result for the g word and the b word above.

January 19, 2005

try this cocktail

3T cayenne pepper
3T country time lemonade mix
1 head garlic, peeled and chopped
1 cup boiling water

Put the cayenne and country time in a glass. Place a tea strainer containing the garlic over the top. Pour the boiling water over the top and through the tea strainer until the resulting juice wets the cayenne and country time in the bottom of the glass. Squoosh at the garlic a bit with a spoon, imagining the juices coming through the tea strainer. Don't add the whole cup of boiling water, you'll be sorry, because now you have to drink it.

The second cold in as many weeks deserves tough love.

a technorati question

Here's a request. Can someone explain to me how to use Technorati? Yes, I've read the help file and the FAQ. I can place a link in the search bar. Here's the use case.

"Jane" has a weblog at http://jane. Last night she posted her masterpiece, the secret of the universe in haiku form. Now it's the morning. 100 people have written and linked back to her. She wants to know which ones. So, she goes to Technorati. She enters http://jane. No results.

Now her haiku post happens to be entry 186. If she enters the url such as http://jane/archive-permalink-whatzit?ref=186 then she'd hit payback. The trouble is, Jane is so full of good ideas she can't keep track of which number is her great haiku post. She kinda thinks she shouldn't have to. By rights, she thinks she ought to enter http://jane and have the people linking to her haiku post show up. Or at least http://jane.* or something.

What am I missing? What is Jane missing?

January 17, 2005

no-tech

For those of you open to a no-tech solution, check out moleskines. There's a quote somewhere from Brian Eno that says in effect that artists aren't any different, they are just prepared for the art when it arrives. Can't tell you how unprepared I am at the moment, or how many lost ideas, action items, or revelations vanish as soon as I step out of the car.

January 16, 2005

no blogging at work

My posting has been slowing down. I've been living the tension between desire and reality, but not necessarily writing about it. This has required some discipline. For example, I have yet to post to this blog from my work machine, even outside business hours. I consider this a key accomplishment, but you can see the postings get pretty thin. There was a while last week where internal MS blogs were down, so all these ideas cluttered up my brain and caused me to commit traffic violations and such. Glad that's over.

So, here are some highlights of things which would normally be complete blog posts on their own.
- I ordered a pack of the HughTrain business cards, just in time for the Bloggers Business Conference. Now I won't be the only loser with no cards.
- We set up a computer in my 4 year old's bedroom. He's addicted to NickJr. But he can't drag and drop yet, or read, so this is a major usability problem, even for the NickJr site.
- All changing table stuff is moved to the basement with the new carpet but unfortunately the spiders are still there. It's amazing how bringing in one room for one designated space can open up the rest of the house. But Ewwww.
- Exercise equipment still unused. I blame arachnaphobia, as well as my ancient Rio which I was hoping to listen to podcasts on during treadmilling. I can't find a non-1394 cord for the USB. Can't even buy one (easily).
- Not a day doesn't go by that I try to take my own advice, and open up my calendar to make room for what I want to happen this year. Never have I felt so powerless at this. My entire existence is whining and sleep (when finally the whining stops). After 7 hours I am awakened again with the whining. I think I need to become a drug addict, perhaps speed or meth? (Have to quit nursing then obviously).
- I found RSSCalendar interesting, but was not brave enough to move my data. Why not some simple assurance that "yes, there's an export feature." I suppose I could try it with dummy data, but why?
- Does anyone know how to record a voicemail from a cell phone to an audio file that can be used as a podcast? Are there voicemail systems that support export?
- Not only does the above idea have merit in itself, but I'm veering away from the data entry problem for calendar portability. I now think that smarter voicemail will be a better - and hands free - solution. More on that later.

I'm at Victrola right now. Some boys are talking project management and proposals. Have to run, it's loud. Don't want to eavesdrop.

January 12, 2005

things that make you go "glong"

I know she wrote this a few days ago, but it's resonating with me loudly. The quote is that "candidates are not good at self selection." It's an amazing concept. Almost spiritual. Let's take the cases that could arise from this:

- Rephrasing: Candidates cannot always tell, from the job description, which job is best for them to apply to. Assuming that the best job would be something they could actually land and succeed at.
-- This is possibly true. But, only the candidate knows how they want their career to go.
- But could it mean: Candidates don't quite know how to ride the wave of their abilities and how they map to the opportunities out there. They can't surf. They think surfing is telling the wave what to do.
-- Admittedly, I still think one of these waves will respond to my directional commands. And when it does, I'll be ready. The catch is to not frustrate myself, my mate, or my employer during the interim.
- Taking to another context, it's insulting: Bachelors are not good at choosing a bride. They always choose the tall and blonde, which is unattainable and often not the happiest arrangement for them.
-- We sometimes use other people's opinions to help us know more about a person. This is different from using a matchmaker, but FOAF does work as a descriptive intermediary. Perhaps a more accurate arrangement would be to say that picking your spouse out of a line-up doesn't work, and neither does picking your job out of a job board.

Not sure where this is going, but the concept seems to question our basic sense of self determination. Not that I want to be effective on this front. I just want to FEEL like I'm effective.

January 11, 2005

forget b****

Talk about branding. Talk about transparency. Talk about someone who knows how to start (and finish) the conversation. Nobody is bloggier than this gal, without a blog. Yes, it's the Crabby Office Lady, heroine of the "vaguely work related" goof off at work contingent. She's hip, funny, and dedicated. I'd be crabby too.

After watching these videos, you'll ask yourself "how does she do it all without a blog?" It's possible...

January 08, 2005

someone stole my life

OK, it was Johnathan Raban in "Waxwings." Set in Seattle in 1999, a character named Beth counts on her vesting stock options with her dotcom, and purchases an Audi. Her husband comes up with a crazy contractor scheme to fix their old house. And they have a four year old. As chilling as this is, it's nowhere near as chilling as my realization that his Beth, in the book, is unpleasant in exactly the same way I am unpleasant. Which, on occasion, I am. Unpleasant. So she's copied my unpleasantness too. I'm so happy she's not the main character, I don't think I could even stand to read it.

I purchased this book, along with the LOTR box set, in a fit of anti-spendthriftism. Truth be told, Waxwings sat for a year on my library queue, and my number never came up. Eventually they kicked me off the queue when I was just under 100, meaning I was not quite the 100th person waiting for the book. (You can't drag reservations out longer than a year.)

January 06, 2005

the tyrrany of items

Julie Leung has put a great deal of thought into snapshots of her organizational life. I love this kind of pondering. For the person who is there, it seems overwhelming, but somehow I find it refreshing. Look where all you can go from here, it makes me think. Maybe that's strangely optimistic, but there you go.

Children's paperwork: I save these in a big stack under the bed. Once I even kept them dust-free by using an under-bed container. Then for thank-you notes I just send off a packet with the card inside. I like to think it makes an impression. It sure fills up somebody's fridge if they want it to. I suppose mailing off the contents of our recycling bin would do the same.

Children's toys: We made little stacks last weekend, hoping to clean up enough that we could ever hire a cleaning service ever again. We chose 3 as the number of piles, and divided like items, so a puzzle went in each pile for example. It got a little arbitrary at the end, but there's a great selection now and only 1/3 the stuff. Now we only have to rotate. But the trick was to not involve the kid at all, it made it much easier.

Books: When poverty strikes, I sell my book collection. This is teriffic, because libraries have better service, and are free, and I can't believe I waited so long before using them. Plus no clutter or the librarians will be out to get you to return your books. They can be very persuasive.

Flylady: I as well never subscribed due to their inability to give birth to technically clueful children who could teach e-mail etiquette and ability to manage a simple mailing list.

Used baby products: Drop em off! We'll take em! Although at 7 months we're buying 18month clothes and wearing size 5 nappies. Oh well. Gotta stop feeding this guy.

Clutter: It's easier for me because I believe in bribery. Want to play Halo 2? Pick up your toys! Although nothing in the world will allow Halo 2 in the house anymore. Things I thought I would never say: "Don't shoot your friends!" It just got too depressing, my 4 year old wandering around corpses with some guy nagging at him to take out something called a boarding craft. Sounds a little too much like home life, to me. At least the nagging part. Okay, I can be corpse like at times too.

Blogs: I regularly delete my entire news folder and start it up from scratch. I always delete unread items when I do this. When reading, I usually only skim looking for either a) personal posts I can use for fuel for my happiness focus back here, or b) stuff relevant for work that I can forward.

GTD: I wish I could read one person who started out skeptical of it and then found it worked great for them as time went on. Instead it's always "It was the perfect system but then I fell behind and now I feel like crap it's all my fault." Holy smokes. That got something done, alright. What I like is having a theme to the year, either family or individual, and that makes everything else fall away. Like you don't have to cook AND be a genius poet. One year is just the perfect length of time because you know another year is coming, you have plenty of time to at least try everything. Or at least 60-70 more things depending on how old you are now. I strongly disagree with the common theory that life balance means you have a little bit of everything going on all the time. Balance might be that you do one thing at work and one thing at home. OK two things at home. But to me balance means peace that nothing is nipping at your heels and you can live in the moment. That's the theory anyway.

Gluttony: I go on news boycotts if it affects me too deeply in a specific unproductive sort of way. Lots of people live and die by the news. To not read the morning paper would be a crime. I skip the news the way skinny people skip lunch and go for a jog instead. I skip the news and go for a nice write. The external world has a funny relevance. I think it's healthy to have a boundary that it can't cross. Lots of people don't have that boundary or don't believe it's morally correct. I think we have to do what's best for ourselves first, like it says in the pamphlet on the airplane.

Stuff: Out of my 10 years of marriage I have spent maybe 3 of them throwing things away full time. Meaning that's my full time job. Hubby comes home and asks "what did you throw away today, dear?" (Just kidding, he never asked, thankfully. Once I put our third and mostly-broken TV on the sidewalk with a free sign on it. I never did live that down. ) My point is it was my job. I have paid for daycare in order to have free time to throw things away. The storage boxes came, I filled them up, and it took maybe 2 months per box to get rid of it. That was just one example. So this purging is a big investment I'm reaping the rewards of now. And of course I'm delighted about it, and would do it all again in a second. But it was my whole life, no job, no hobbies, just getting rid. Scary.

January 02, 2005

my family on reality tv jan 12

Here is a link to the press release, and another to some photos. I suppose it's pretty obvious which family I'm related to.