« July 2005 | Main | September 2005 »

August 29, 2005

jam-packed calendar

Today I was guilty of believing in LaProxy (otherwise known as LaProxyIsm), wherein one believes that toting around your laptop so it has close proximity with you will actually result in accomplished work. There it was, banging against my hip, and no not in a nice way either, but alas the work is still pending.

Probably brought on by the sudden (!!) realization that my temp gig du jour is going away (when will I learn), I have responded with what I think is a suitable and practical response. I have packed my calendar full of everything humanly possible and then some. Actually, I still have music and, oh right, something called "health and fitness" waiting to get on the list. I'm glaring at September, a month in which I am still sortof working, mind you, and not only do I have a job, a job search, vanished daycare, and a deadline driven house project to fit in, but I have also added two parenting support groups (hey, I'm fickle), and I'm flirting with being in the chorus of the next MSTT production. MSTT is the theater troupe at Microsoft. I wonder if they'll let me stay without a keycard. I have also made a) being nice to everyone, and b) not freaking out a requirement. Those last two are kindof a Z-axis thing. So the scariest thing is all these things happen at the same time. It looks like the rent party* will have to go on without me, because I'm at rehearsal with my kids knitting doilies while belting out adelaide's lament and studying for my web services exam.

I have a really funny story to tell you about a phone interview but I probably shouldn't just yet. There is also a really sad story about me wanting to come to terms with my past, which would be so much easier to tell if I had a blackbox audio recorder in my car. Also I'm attending something tomorrow I will probably not be talking about either. Then there is the thing I can talk about, such as my thesis "A. Hamilton was the original self-help guru. Discuss." Which I plan to, at length, when I can finally see again. I mention all this just to prove to you that I try, albeit not very hard, to keep you entertained.

* rent parties are parties thrown for profit to pay the rent, the hipster's last resort. I have never been to one or thrown one, let's call that plan B shall we?

August 27, 2005

transfixed

I can't take my eyes off this material on the (unfortunately named, I think) site "the pathway." If you follow this link, go past the stuff about menus and into the daily mindfulness. To me, this is gold.

link love

Sending all possible link love to my seattle vacation home listing on vrbo.com

Large Luxury In-City Seattle View Home

Regular readers can ignore this. Of course I was considering an add-on service of helping you prep for your Microsoft interview if that's why you are here. Then, reality hit. Perhaps you'd rather be prepped by someone who was hired? The obsession continues. Bursting into song seems appropriate.

August 25, 2005

not sorry, no, not one little bit

I'm not all that sorry for the lack of posting recently. You shouldn't be, either. What's happening is I am shielding you all, my dear readers, against the tornado-like forces of the current happenings. Most importantly, I'm shielding you from my rash interpretations of those forces, and the resulting downward spiral that I would be loathe to read about at a future date.

If I were to write a happy, optimistic, and generalizable post right now, it would be "How to keep your chin up while changing things, despite the fact that your efforts are making things temporarily worse, and what you really wanted was to make things better." Of course I have no advice on the subject, my chin being decidedly down. Muddling through.

TOPICS to write a well reasoned-post on later include:
* Moms, and having things in common with other Moms.
* Therapy, and why to be justifiably fearful.
* Support system incompatability.
* The cavalry isn't coming and guess what I have to raise my own kids. ACK!
* The Dr. Phil guide to truth (truth = actually true + helpful to you). How this guide slices through a flawed decision. A decision autopsy, if you will.
* The continual struggle to enjoy the here and now despite temporary "suffering." The wisdom of lawn chairs.
* Why dropping every project to watch TV in front of the air conditioner for 12 hour stretches sounds like a great idea. Doesn't it? Depends on the TV I suppose.

August 22, 2005

startup

Many machines have logic that require a certain amount of action on startup. Some of these are built-in by the machine, or the operating system, and others are the widgets that the guest has added. Of course it is important that the machine and the operating system work. It is important that the widgets work too. But do they all need to work at startup?

Consider a matrix of dependencies with various components.

Component Name Source Dependency of
-------------- ------ -------------
MouseComponent Machine All
CalendarTSR OS Office
TimeTracker Guest (n/a)

This matrix has three programs, each with their own manufacturer. The matrix is also open to all manufacturers, but centrally located on the guest's machine. The way the logic would work is, the only set of components that would launch themselves at startup are the ones who have as their dependency list "All." Conversely stated, if the guest cannot run a single program or do anything without this component loaded, it gets the rating of "All" which means a load at startup is appropriate.

The tricky thing about maintaining such a list is that products (the ones in the dependency of column) would need to modify component's entries, components for which they do not own. This is not a 1:1 relationship necessarily, as I have posited here for simplicity. The CalendarTSR may be a dependency of Office as well as PhoneGod2000. Neither Microsoft nor PhoneGod Technologies is the company behind CalendarTSR, but once they discover it is a dependency in their test suite, they need to modify the column. This should not in any way irk the CalendarTSR people off, but rather make them happy that so many apps need the component.

Now on to solving the real use case. We load too many things on startup. Let's come up with a plan that loads these things just-in-time, without breaking anything. The functionality is a lot like security models which assume least privilege, then contain a configuration to let you log in as admin for a certain transaction before reverting back to non-admin. In the example above, MouseComponent should run at startup. CalendarTSR should load as the guest decides to boot Office (note there is a big difference between the USER booting Office and some sort of default boot such as the Office Clipboard which boots itself whether the user wants Office this very second or not.) The TimeTracker application is not a dependency of anything, so it does not boot at startup or piggyback on any other applications.

The reason why startup is such a historically "reasonable" place to launch applications is there is a presumption the guest will be waiting for a series of things to happen, and we might as well wait for that as well. It is better to burden startup than - gasp - your own application or someone else's. This is well meaning thinking, what I am proposing is for us to move to a model where startup is treated like a pit stop on the indy 500 rather than the dumping ground of the computing world. By having a more granular approach the computer can actually be more responsive to guests by relieving the burden of minutes-long startup processes.

August 20, 2005

shaping up the house

This vacation home project is really humming along. I was completely deflated last week when I found out that purchasing everything on my shopping list new would equal the price of a vacation. That's just unacceptable. So with great resignation I looked to alternative sources and have actually reached the tipping point. This thing might actually work!

The first thing we did was come up with a budget. Since we are on the envelope system, there was already money in the household envelope from prior months. So that's a no-brainer to include. Then, we did a soft reboot on the August finances in the other envelopes down to bare minimum, and donated everything else to the cause.

The dining room table was spread out with handyman fix-it projects. The table had either specialized tools for the job, or existing parts, and each little pile had a sticky note explaining what was to be done and at what point to change plans. The dining room table got $100. The tasks were everything from bark dust to fixing lamps. Lots of miscellany. I'm reading by one of those new, fixed lamps right now. It was my grandmother's. I remember twirling its hexagonal shape between my fingers as I waited for something new to happen over there, as it always did. Now the lamp is working again after a few years. I'm glad we kept it.

The next category was the "definitely costs money" category. We decided on two things, a plumber for our schizophrenic dishwasher, and a handyman for our back door which persists in requiring a certain drafty clearance from the floor in order to open. We could have fixed lots of other things. For example, the house has a unique key for every lock in every door, which will make you mad if you try to label your keys and similarly mad if you don't. But deteriorations and wastefulness outbid mere irritants. The costs-money category got only $120. So the plumber and handyman in those cases is my dh, which as he will freely admit definitely puts those projects at-risk.

The last category is the "definitely costs money - home furnishings" category of which I am in charge. Today, like last weekend, I got up early and began "garage sale-ing." It's like going sailing only spelled different. As of today, the budget is completely spent in my category, which was $200 to start with. Truth be told I do need a few more things in the sheets category - although I have the duvets and the mattress pads taken care of, which were most expensive. I also need more towels. I think the budget was under by maybe $100, but I'm willing to sacrifice my ebay account towards the cause, so that will help. Overall I'm feeling very successful about thinking on the fly on what will match and what will look good. I have only made a few mistaken purchases: the pillowcases that had "property of south hill academy" written in sharpie - how did I miss that? And then the sheet set that was supposed to be double but turns out to be twin. For some reason I am having huge luck in the cutesy-pie shabby-chic type style, which is fine, it is certainly clearly distinguishable from our own and thereby our regular more masculine and definitely more crappy sheets will never get intermixed with these lofty groomed poodle type products.

While that is going fairly successfully, I am also finding some great stuff in other categories that I can't resist. Right now I have treated 2 1950s bowling bags to one of what will be many treatments to restore the original lustre and hopefully pass as something usable for the fall season. I know they are from the 50's because the name tag has the phone number starting with letters. Those were an easy buy. The big houses are invariably run by people I will have a lot in common with 30 years from now. They are thrifty, know the value of an item, and detail oriented enough to insist on it. I have vowed not to buy any clothes this Fall - only things like shoes, coats, bags, things you don't normally think of - but this one sale was my weakness today. Good thing I am not 1 size smaller (yeah, good thing. Hmmm.) because I would have bought the whole rack of specialty handmade and forward-looking items. As it was I bought only two, out of entertainment, so that's it for lattes for the month for me.

The garage sale scene in Seattle on Saturday mornings is huge. Lots of families, lots of people in transition and neighborhoods feeling normal. People talking to each other like they have known each other forever. One woman running the cash register at the big house sale used to watch my oldest boy. She stood guard as I changed in the living room. Now that's a neighborhood.

Speaking of lattes, I was practically assaulted today by a couch. I drove up to the thrift store and there it was, it had just been donated, and hadn't even gone through the pricing or warehouse stage. I sat on it and was chastised by my dh. "It's not on the list!" he said fairly. I asked how much it was and it was 40 bucks. This is for a clean, attractive couch with all the cushions and no evil smell. We are short about 6 couches in casa Titanic so I put my foot down. "We're buying it." After a semi-fight in the parking lot that was a little too white trash for my taste, I bought it out of entertainment. This means definitely no lattes unless I sell something on ebay, which is a thought. Dh rebelled by picking up random things in the store saying they were great deals even though we didn't need them. I rebelled by spending the next 3 hours securing transporation for the couch and making it happen, then dropping dead of exhaustion.

I'm sitting on the new couch now, and honestly, I think someone was just in a hurry to move and couldn't fit it in the truck. This is a great find. I'm writing from a new corner of my living room lit up by my grandmother's newly-fixed lamp. I'm washing loads of shabby chic sheets and drinking 15.00 wine that I got for 5.00. If I get too used to this, I will never be able to buy prada again.

August 19, 2005

relevancy

Link to Fred Wilson via Hugh, and I quote:

We've largely solved the 'automate and process' problems.
But we haven't begun to scratch the surface of the relevancy problem.

This is absoloutely right. If anything is going to keep me in computing over 2005 - 2015 it is going to be this.

Hugh and Sig have the beginnings of an idea - start solving the problem by giving it a container called "flow.". I wonder: sometimes that works. Like when you start out a new project, crack open the xml and build your structure. But I wonder if we will do the trick by instead making existing objects visible or sticky. Right now with relevancy, our applications have no visibility into the existing knowledge artifacts, or if they did there is no way of linking them expertly and conclusively.

Either way it's a long term endeavor.

August 18, 2005

when too much is just that

$1700 to outfit three beds properly. These are beds that we already have and are already using, with very little damage to life or limb. Proper outfitting of a bed includes every kind of pad for everything, the pillows get a cover and then the case, and on and on with everything else. I wonder if people will forgive us if they stay in our vacation home with matresses on the floor and only 1 change of sheets? Nah, they won't forgive us.

I remember remodeling the house and how much we spent on trim. First there is a board that you start with, the one that covers up all your drywall mistakes. Then you have to have something floor-colored to ramp up from the floor to the board you just put in. Then the top of the board needs something to protect its horizontal self from the onslaught of dust. But you can't do a perfect ramp in either case, so then you do a little flat part at each junction, which needs its own trim. Next thing you know you've built one of those fractal universes for skateboarding bugs, including off-ramps each for visible bugs, microbes, and particles of light. They have their own skateboard ramp too, which happens to be the trim that trimmed up the trim. Eventually something does not need trimmed out or mietered, just because of those annoying bug labor laws. But perfection must always be sought.

That's how setting up a proper bed is. Fractal covers on covers to protect other covers. In fact, I think we're getting off cheap! Too bad my wallet isn't fractal.

August 16, 2005

my so-called profession

I didn't find this funny at all. But why? Why so sensitive? Why so discouraged? After all, developers are people too. Well, I'll tell you:

Why not funny: Because it's just sad, is all. If the project was something meaningless I'd understand. But this is ostenibly for features a customer wants, that would change the industry or be just technically cool. We shouldn't be working on projects that fall outside that union, right?

Why so sensitive: I sound like a broken record, but I am this sensitive because it increases my ability to empathise with guests who use our product. It's just one switch. I can't case it out so I have a thick skin with co-workers, and a thin skin with guests. Don't insult me and I'll be a wellspring of information that will save you time. Insult me and I'll wallow, singlehandedly bringing down the GNP. That's bad, right?

Why so discouraged: This is all such old school stuff. Program management has come out of its infancy of primary roles being a glorified meeting-scheduler and note-taker. Nowadays, you can't really do your job as a program manager without having been dev. This takes the old rug-of-entitlement right out from under the feet of many PMs, I know, but if I can pull through it you can. I get discouraged when the PM "image" persists as the office with the candy outside the door. No way. We didn't work this hard to get to the funnest position in software to be left behind.

On developers / people: The PM position is there to DEFEND developers from anything that detracts from creativity and brilliance. This, in turn, takes its own creativity and brilliance. In no case does a PM assign developers tasks. Developers want to be part of a project with momentum, a project that would write itself if they went home for the night. A project so exciting that staying around all night to be a part of it is preferable to letting it complete on its own momentum. I completely get it. Let's get there without too much humiliation, shall we?

Anyway, I didn't find it funny. Perhaps I need more sleep.

some musician friends

I was stunned to see my friend Devin's post on the anti-war movement. People can be completely different in text and online than they are in person. I knew this already with Devin. His website is an outlet to keep his observations about his specific niche music fanship to only interested parties. Lots of sites are like that, such as Walt Mossberg's baseball site. One can imagine someone (perhaps Walt's wife) getting bored with all the expundancies, and saying "mail it to someone who cares!" Thus the website, where we all care or we wouldn't be subscribed. But Devin's observations are so heartfelt and true it shows why it's worth listening to the detritus. This is the real guy, seen in person only rarely. (Note, we all have detritus and, reflexively, these types of non-actionable observations are probably mine.)

I was thrilled (yeah, that's me, stunned and thrilled. Maybe tone it down a notch?) to see my old buddy Steve Ball get scobleized on Channel 9. Steve continues to be an inspiration of what an ordinary person can do without any blocking issues. He may have blocking issues, but they sure don't block him from his work. Steve has a more grand sense of what work is, more like Work as in Life's Work. His music is emotionally important, his work in technology is important especially in the entrepreneurial sense - he is most excited when there is an intersection. Steve has been the messenger for me of a life lesson that he is currently unaware of delivering - this having to do with karma and connectivity even as the world is going to h e double hockey sticks. More on that later. Steve was one of the first webloggers around before they started calling it that. I remember my dh telling me Steve had an online journal, oh maybe around 1995 or so. I asked "Why would anyone want to do that? EVERY DAY?" Joke's on me now. The most vivid memory I have of Steve is him practicing guitar in the Microsoft stairwells, in a desperate but effective reach toward work life balance. He has been an inspiration to me since the early days of MSN from when he "programmed everything himself" for a particular demo to a client. This rocked my world, this was my first inkling I was going to have to step my liberal-arts ass up to "make it" in this world. (Someone please get all these phrases from the 1970s out of my fingers. Thank you.)

Finally, I found this terrific piece of prose via Halley Suitt, written by a person new to me. This is just great, a little scary, but brilliant. And some of the best songwriting I've seen in a while.

Love to everybody.

August 14, 2005

gibson on U2

William Gibson has an article on touring with U2. Interesting article more for Gibson than for the band. It was a long series of accurate metaphors succinctly drawn, a feat which always tells more about the observer than the observed. The only part he got wrong was when he conjectured what careers the band members would have if not for the band. I conjecture that Clayton would have been the one running from the law, and Mullen would have been the law. Gibson had the supposition the other way around. Gosh, the least you can do if you're going to be a real reporter is to verify "facts" like these. Good thing there's bloggers to set the story straight.

quiet

Right now is the quietest spot in the weekend. I'm refusing to look at my calendar to see whether I've left myself a care-package or a bomb in a box from last week for tomorrow's schedule. The house was filled with food and people who take up more of the room than I do, which I hear is saying a lot. Like many shy and introverted people, when I'm in a larger group I override my innate tendencies by cranking it up and not giving room for anybody else. And I've been called on that. This weekend, everyone took up more of the room than I did, so I had every justification in becoming a wallflower in my own home.

I don't think I left the house all weekend. I have air conditioning. You wouldn't leave, either.

When taking lucky moments to stare into space, with other people talking, I am absolutely preoccupied with my relationship with Microsoft, my dotted-line employer. I have had it feels like a dozen interviews where I have taken up the room (and probably the building) with my enthusiasm. I have internalized the cheerleading where you just need to be yourself, and then been soooo myself that people were relieved to see the back of me, relieved I could provide the service of making the other candidate seem so normal. I know this belonging-thing is an ancient holdover from my girlhood, and my learning technology is the same sort of thing, the jeans you look forward to wearing, the handbag you can't quite afford. I could spend my life at writer's conferences looking around at clones of myself and feel like there was noplace for me to go, but that's just the self-judgment talking and if I was happy with the writer's conference side of me - the eileen fisher short hair studied latin reads utne reader side - if I was happy with that I would be happy. I suppose that's a tautology, but my point is the quest for Microsoft does not have to shape the next 10 years or 10 months. I can discard it for what it is - a distraction and an excuse, and a fruitless and unprofitable one at that.

Many times people have condescendingly told me that it's for the best that I don't work there, that I have a real purpose elsewhere, and I should hurry up and find it. They continue to theorize that maybe the whole field isn't for me at all. And I'm over that, I'm over the condescension anyway. Honestly I'm not at all over the idea of wanting and wishing for my work with technology to happen exactly the way I always had planned. I know I'm not over it because right now, thinking about tomorrow, it would be more comfortable for me to cold-call a certain list of hiring managers than it would be for me to adjust my thinking, acknowledge those condescending people were probably right, and do something else with my time.

In the spirit of blogs being a sort of online confessional, and of you all keeping me honest, I'm posting this because if I believed MS was going to happen I wouldn't post something like this at all. I'm posting this anyway, because I'm not thinking "what if a hiring manager reads this?" - I'm open to new things. I'm scared, but resigned not to keep up an effort for which I have every evidence is futile.

You know what was the funniest moment for me when watching Live8 on video? Remember, now, there was all kinds of acts happening. There was the Black eye peas, with the jumping up and down. There was that awful bittersweet symphony band with the string parts that make you want to tear your ears off if it would help. There was Simon LeBon who miraculously hit the high notes for Wild Boys, bully for you mate. Then Bill Gates came on the stage. Now, you have to understand I'm an artist, it's my core identity if you will, and I like to think it's really more of a methodology than a profession, and it can be applied to supposedly non-arty endeavors like software with uniquely marketable results. That's the theory anyway. As an artist, I should have more in common with other artists, right? Well, something funny happened when Bill came on stage. My eyes just relaxed a bit, like they do when you see someone from home in a foreign country. I thought: "My people! He's one of my people! A techie, Yaay!" Now, perhaps this is learned behavior on my part, some sort of pavlovian thing. But I remember when Microsoft was a place where unique people could excel, a time when we weren't all trying to be so exceedingly normal that we would have default empathy with our users (I'm saying "guests" now) who are really our $400 upgrade customers. There was a time when being a freak paid off. Bill is from that time. That's the Microsoft I would like to apply to work for.

Well, anyway, if you're reading this, please keep me honest and help me apply for work at places that are really there, and not places I imagine or would need time machines to reach.

August 13, 2005

begging

I am wasting time refining a concept for a snazzy job application to Microsoft. But the tides are against me completing anything. Here are the blocking issues, as they say:
1) If I want to put time into a thoughtful presentation, the material is going to be thoughtful as well. This means describing what I uniquely have to offer that is different than other applicants. Presenting cute flash puppet shows within a 2 minute time limit is not what makes my application unique. If this was a real assignment in the workplace, I'd outsource it.
2) Say I don't mind all that, and was willing to plow ahead with the thoughtful presentation and time limit etc. The next problem is how excruciatingly personal these applications are to me. In 1991, Microsoft said "no" to me on the same day my dh said "yes," and those two answers have shaped my daily activities since that date. Are my digital storytelling capabilities up to rendering this justice in the timeframe?
3) I'm grown-up enough to know what I'm getting into with Microsoft. Sometimes I just put my hands in my face and go "why." For example, getting a blue badge means having to put up with an unfair system of reviews. It also means aligning myself with people that would patent one of the 11 herbs and spices if they had the right intel. I love Microsoft as a place to work because of the reach it has to individuals. It's like working for the Rolling Stones. Everything is big big big. So are the egos, so are the screwups. There's just an incredibly big distance between the personal role the company has for me, and some of the company's image and behaviors. The puppet show would just exacerbate that. The grown-up part knows I can navigate these waters and be happy and successful there, eyes wide open to everything. In 2 minutes, I could only show the adolescent side of my application, which would make me look clueless.
4) Did I mention finishing my current v- project, turning our house into a vacation home, hiring interns, and finding my parenting stride (the latter is via disciplined action on my part as well as improved support system in my network) Oh, and it all has to be done by Sept 15.
5) It strikes me that this type of offer will only bring out the creations of a) young folks with an idealized vision of MS that can be packaged neatly, and b) unemployed folks with time on their hands. As you can tell, I do not have either of these assets. (warning, link just above not work-friendly)

Ach, du lieber.

I'm still working on it though. It's a compulsion.

August 09, 2005

grandiose plans

Light posting means heavy duty on other things, right? Well you can rest easy. I sure am. I am almost caught up with Alias so I will be fit for the season 4 premiere on Sept 29. I'm thinking of throwing a thing before that to watch the cliffhanger from season 3 with other fans.
UPDATE: Season 4 comes out on DVD on Oct 24. And Season 5 has every indication of coming out in January. I have scoured the Internet and can only verify the first fact (Oct) and not the second (Jan). I can't find any record of the Sept 29 anymore, so no source no story. It was probably last year's season start date.

When it rains it pours. My assignment at work is coming to a close, which is the most passive way of stating that I will be spending the next month cramming the square peg into the round hole and hope the work lives on to do some good after I'm gone. OK I suppose your choices are passive-sounding or fatalistic-sounding. A month of notice is very courteous in this business, so I am grateful. Nevertheless, I would love to not miss a single day of work and transition smoothly to my next assignment. Hello, active candidate status. Usual rules still apply.

The weeks of waiting are over, as well, to decide on what flavor of grandiose plans we will embark on in order to travel more, live life more flexibly, and not be so darn rigid about things. This is a multi-point plan and we are spending August just tooling up. Because an idea is great and all, but laying the groundwork first is the deal-maker that will let us say "yes." And what's more geeky than tools?
* Mobile workspace. Closure on technical requirements end of this month. Delegate the task of acquiring these requirements.
* Travel fund. Spend 2 weekends powering up the house to list as a vacation home for long weekends we want to be gone. Organization and maintenance. Delegate some of the work (for the 10% standard property management cut) to someone else.
* Consider dropping the no-refunds, can't change days around daycare to a more customizable sitter/nanny type thing.
* Take out ads for interns for college credit before fall quarter starts.
* Instead of leaning on folks to babysit, just lean on people to be available via phone at certain times. This will give us some of our independent-george time back, if we can be braver about the solo parent routine happening ever. I have one yes so far, and it feels like a lot less to ask.
A previous edition of the plan is outlined here in embarrassing detail.

Finally, today I finally reach fashion acquisition nirvana, having timed my shopping spree with exactly the moment the good stuff* goes on sale. So something must be going right.

* Note, not that actual good stuff, but same designer. Whee!

August 07, 2005

ah, rules

It's 9:50 in the morning on a Sunday. I just read practically all of dooce.com. My writing may never recover. I have 2 choices: become a pariah, and go down in interesting multicolor flames, or suck it up and become an information source. I know my dear readers would appreciate the former. I haven't had the guts to do it - too much discretion. I will keep posting, but know that as always it is just a shadow of the post I COULD make. And thats (select one) a) a darn shame b) a relief c) just another example of being chicken d) same as everyone else.

Had fun at Aimee Mann last night. With kids even.
UPDATE: Sorry no link love the first time around, Michael. I ran into Michael at Aimee Mann and made a fool out of myself wondering where I knew him from. Was it Robert? It's always Robert! No, it wasn't Robert. Turns out I added a bunch of new links from Jeff Sandquist's Sammamish meetup, so I would know who I'd be meeting. Then I proceeded to talk to Brad Wilson the entire time at the meetup, so having a good time but perhaps not mingling as I had intended. But I still have the subscriptions, and that's where Michael came in. I was fascinated with his blog because unicode is soooo geeky, and because I was almost diagnosed with MS myself back in 1999. I dodged that bullet, but many others still hit me so I suppose it all evens out. Michael, I'm still waiting on that report on nonhuman languages! All I know about unicode is, you had better learn about it if you want to use anything but notepad.exe to edit your xml. Perhaps by keeping subscribed I will someday know much much more. (end of update)

Have to go enforce the "must have clothes to get into the pancake house" rule. Bye now,

August 01, 2005

ask the oracle

Rory called in sick today to his blog. This sounds like the real deal. It's not one of those things where you muster up fake phlegm for the phone call to the boss and then sail off into summer fun for the rest of the day. Although it was a mysterious, oracular message that he left.

Rory, I was just bragging about your writing to Brad Wilson the other day at the Sammamish meetup. That probably sounds strange but seriously, your blog is a pleasure to read and it's a very short leap to me taking credit for showing up and reading, it feels like that much of an event.

OK back you go to fixing it all. I think Robert is off too, but we all know why.